Cocaine & P***y

| 12,377 Views
36
70
COMMENTS

What did the king of all things say he wanted when he started his career?  Simple.  "Cocaine and p*ssy". 

Now you can't imagine that goal leading to much more than a two hit wonder rapper that made his highest radio play off of his smash "Booty juice" (shout out to Fear of a Black Hat) but by some miraculous twist of fate and hard work that goal gave birth to a mogul that continues to inspire millions; a man living, breathing, and continually defining hip hop.            

I use that intro to bring this idea to the table: Aren't we all taking  ourselves a lil' too seriously? In the entertainment industry there is this strong pressure to be an artist that has "longevity and credibility". Don't get me wrong; those are amazing goals but all too often, we measure every action of an artist as to whether it will directly achieve those goals.  Webster’s dictionary defines longevity as "a long continuance". Credibility is defined as "the quality of inspiring belief".  Those definitions are subjective and therefore capable of holding different meanings depending on who you ask. Who on earth is so all knowing and and all powerful that they should be the one to define the goal or meaning for another's life and career? 

What I've experienced on the music end is a constant pressure to "ACT right and SPEAK right". The industry people telling me this are not trying to instill better behavior in order to help make me a better person or allow me to learn some valuable life lesson.  They're telling me, in their words, to be "as vague and opinionless as possible, so you don't offend the masses, so you will sell a higher number of records".  The industry provides endless hours of media training. Yes, they actually hire people to give you the "right" answer. How inspiring is that? I'm sure there are exceptions and industry leaders that rebel against this format and for those of you involved with them... more power to you! I can only speak from my experience, and I'm sure this applies far beyond the depths of the music industry, as most jobs are usually selling something!

I know artists that are credible, helpful and "down for any cause", that have been denied the ability to do  charity work or to provide aid to a charity, based on the fact that something about them did not fit the charity's standards of an artist who has "credibility and longevity". How ridiculous is that?  We can't even help people any more unless we are living a common denominator life! Do our artists really have to be just like us, act like us, go to the same church, share our political views, or be role models to our children before we buy their music?     

So what I love about the mogul's less than politically correct or "wrong" answer, is maybe we all ought to lighten up and allow our artists to be what they are and say what they really feel or think instead of giving the "vague and opinionless" answer as taught to my generation of artists in order to achieve 'credibility and longevity' to sell more records... Maybe next time the answer should be something as simple as "cocaine and p*ssy".

-Aubrey


Here's Russell's response...

Wow…Funny. When I exposed Aubrey's educational, philanthropic and biz initiatives,  I guess I was guilty of trying to "clean her up."  And now she writes a blog that threatens to clean me up :-).  I guess we are even  :-).

I said it…when I was her age, all I thought I wanted was "cocaine and p*ssy".... I also told her that we as artists and producers always would say the "critic could get the didick!!!!" She shouldn't have to "accept judgment or worry or feel guilty or anything"... .and "the executives words should go in one ear and out the other."  "Just be happy and make music," I said. 

Anyhow .....Cocaine and p*ssy are short cuts to that "mindless state" of "happiness." But I must say, that the lasting state of pure bliss we are all seeking only comes through total clarity. Aubrey is 100 percent right that artists should be free to express honest art and executives and media are too often, too much a consideration. Art comes from the inside and the piece of god or goddess inside of you is the creator. Our access to that god is all that matters.  There is no thinking or analysis involved in that creative process.  So if u are a manager, encourage honesty and limit the forces that kill the artist’s freedom to create. Nowadays I prefer meditation to cocaine...But I haven’t been able to shake the second thing :-).

70 comments

  • hhmmm juss to let you know your a lil physco nasty b*****h!!
  • Namu Myoho Renge Kyo
  • BTW Russel --- I love your new Avatar :)
  • Now I can get with that! LIL KIM is my GURL! I love Lil Kim. She's a Hardcore Rapper & One of the 1st Ladies to bring Sexy to Hip Hop.
  • honesty is cool>>>> queen bee taught some young women to be tough shes a sweet heart most images in biggie movie... are made to be their very best hers was a bit flawed? shes a iconic figure if u say she is i do lets see what she has to say good night or as yogis say namaste (the god in me sees the god in you)
  • tomorrow morning lil kim will talk to the haters and the hip hop community tell her side " no spin" tomorrow on globalgrind.com we ,the globalgrind community, are a safe haven for all hip hop i know they , the media, can catch u with your pants down ..... i know first hand : -) people admire the hard work dedication and the perceived success that comes with the payment for artistry or media savvy (or whatever gets one to celebrity status) but they love to tear them down as well the best way to really entertain is to lift people up i know that as well thats why the gg community has its own lane we get constructive dialogue with the celebrities politicians and artists u love we arn"t here to burn them down just lift ourselves up anyhow tommorow my lil sis who i love speaks to gg lil kim tommorow good night
    • It's all good Russ, keep the love coming. But I tell you what.. this community is hardcore! If somebody comes up in here half steppin', they liable to get their feelings hurt! Nothing personal but there are some heavy hitters on this site on the journalistic side. I love contributing. And I truly look forward to the Queen Bee putting it down.
  • Can you guys show the same love to a SISTAH GIRL? I doubt it? N*ggers always quick to defend a white girl but when asked to help a Sistah out you aint got JACK SH*T to say! Holla :)
    • so not true!
    • To answer your question: YES, I DO. I support ANYONE who is real with themselves, even if I do not agree with their positions. Casing point, Monica, "A SISTAH"! Has anyone heard of a release date for Still Standing? Absolutely not, and yet she still hasn't folded against the pressures of her label. She said "you release this, or you release nothing because THIS IS ME" and THAT I can respect. The notion that people are standing up for Aubrey because she is a "white girl" is utterly rediculous and you look even more rediculous by perpetuating that ignorant idea.
    • You must be a N*gger for replying to my comment...
    • There's no comparison with Aubrey & MONICA. Two different calibers, NITT WITT DING BAT!
    • I was answering your dumb a** question. Which in case your forgot it was "can you show the same love to a SISTAH GIRL?". And if you are actually smart enough to read and comprehend the response, you would notice that it wasn't a comparison at all. But chances are, you are NOT actually smart enough to read and comprehend, which would explain why you say things like N*gger and NITT WITT DING BATT. I can see why you identify with Diddy.
    • At the end of the day my GPA is still 4.0 all day long so you can KMBA!
    • I doubt that very seriously. Probably just as much as you doubt Aubrey wrote this blog. But if that makes you feel better......ok. ;)
    • He who laughs last, gets the last Laugh... LMAO
  • You know , this is refreshing .. Aubrey can create dialog ... never knew that about her . guess the industry had her on lock .. giving us the impression of a dumb blonde ... the exact portrait Diddy seemed to have a prob with . so yes . she has made the point that if artist are allowed to speak from the head they may reveal a side that can endear us to them and if they are muzzled we could get the totally wrong view .. sort of letting our eyes form our opinions . What i want to ask to Aubry is , while i get her point and agree ... what was she trying to relay with her drastic change in appearance ?? .. does she not agree she looks like the typical pornstar model ? .. the big blond hair weave .. the racy pics .. the riske gear .. for a group that was sort of the new "it" girl group that alot of young female fans would emulate .. did she not feel a need to represent that stance in all aspects of her career ? can you see how people could get "mixed" messages from what she says and how she does it ? not judging , just asking .. as a man .. i would love to see you naked all day everyday .. but young women need a different model , yes ? anyway .. your hot mama .. millions of women pose naked , the chosen few have careers in music that stand the test . the industry test .. will you pass it or pass on it .
    • "for a group that was sort of the new "it" girl group that alot of young female fans would emulate .. did she not feel a need to represent that stance in all aspects of her career?"



      What aspect are you speaking of exactly? Was it the minimal clothing they wore on stage, the lap dances they gave to guys on stage in their concerts........or was it the songs "Bad Girl", "Lights Out", or "Extacy" that young girls should emulate?



      I only ask because anyone who has actually followed Danity Kane, the group would know that their persona and performances are not really that different from the image the Aubrey O'day portrays. It cracks me up when people try to portray them as the Cheetah Girls, the girl's girl group (meaning ages 11-17). Clearly, they are a woman's girl group and anyone who can look at them and say they are role models for the 11-17 demographic should not have a problem with their 13 year old wanting to take a her 13 year old boyfriend to extacy. I mean, she is supossed to be emulating what she sees Danity Kane do, right?



      See the disconnect yet?

    • U misunderstood .. what you do onstage , as an artist , is different from what you do off of it . To wear a " costume" on stage and to go to a benefit supporting abused women . you would dress and act differently , correct ?? My point being , all female artists singing about sex and love ect. are not defined by their images , unless that is their aim and goal .. and yes .. girls following the careers of artist they are fans of SHOULD know that stage and life are different .. you can be a whore in the bedroom and a Business woman out of it .. correct ? Most artists song are WRITTEN for them !!! So, its is a false reality actually .. according to Aubrey .. she wasn't "that" girl before the deal .. she was on her way to college .. now she is naked in playboy .. what ?
  • well damn
  • This is very true. Even in this society of capitalism, individuality is often frowned upon. It is hard to be as creative through the mind of someone else. Hell, if that were the case, Van Gough, Di Vinci and every mid-century artist would not have been discovered. They would have been critiqued by an art director who would have led the on a different path and vision and history would not be as we know it. Good for you Aubrey.
  • The finished product that we see on television is edited and made to be purely entertainment. So with that said, we have no idea how intelligent or not intelligent Aubrey is. All we can go off of is the broken down video the lovely editors of MTV decided to put out. No matter what people have to say about her, she IS the main reason that DK stayed in the press. For all her antics, she did perform on Broadway and worked on a movie. I dont know her, so I cant stand in judgement of any of her decisions. As a woman I praise her for her willingness to speak her mind and not be afraid to be who she wants to be.

    Im always amazed when I read these comments b/c I wonder why people have so much ugliness inside them?? Why do we feel we have the right to stand in judgement of people we only see once a week on TV?!
    • or buck naked in a magazine .. or 5 magazines .. or 20 .. how many has she done now ?? it's all good .. I like her ... just don't want my daughter to be her . I would support whatever she does but . Beyonce , Mariah and Barbara Streisand . all singers . not one playboy cover among them .
  • I find it interesting that the very people who want Aubrey to "go away" are consistently commenting on her blogs. Just as she has the right to express her views on a blog that Mr. Simmons has allotted for her, you have the right to not read it. As far as the blog entry itself, I don't think it could have been said better. Honesty is the nemesis of the fake and phony, so sometimes when you are too real and hit too close to home it makes them uncomfortable. But at the end of the day, that's THEIR problem, not yours. Keep doing you.
  • Per Aubrey: So what I love about the mogul's less than politically correct or "wrong" answer, is maybe we all ought to lighten up and allow our artists to be what they are and say what they really feel or think instead of giving the "vague and opinionless" answer as taught to my generation of artists in order to achieve 'credibility and longevity' to sell more records... Maybe next time the answer should be something as simple as "cocaine and p*ssy".



    WHY AM I NOT ALLOWED TO BE ME?: ...and say what I really feel or think instead of giving the "vague and opinionless" answers or comments!

  • Well put together Aubrey. Russell thanks for keeping it real as well.
  • i love aubrey! nice post, with good wording

POST A COMMENT

or Sign In

POST TO:

submit comment