This section requires Flash Player (version 9). You can download the Flash player here

 

Celebrity Blogs   >> more Celebrity Blogs

Hate For Sale: Blog by Russell Simmons

| 8,665 Views
6
69
COMMENTS

On Friday, on Global Grind, I read an article about the President of Iran’s denial of the Holocaust. This isn’t the first time that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has denied the Holocaust and I am sure it won’t be the last. However, more disheartening to me were the comments that some of the Global Grind readers left, which included some deep hatred towards Muslims and Jews. We know that the President of Iran will continue with his hatred, but to hear it from our own community really struck a nerve.

After reading the article, I thought a lot about a meeting I had a few weeks ago with Brian Cuban, who happens to be the brother and lawyer of Mark Cuban (owner of the Dallas Mavericks). Brian came to my office to share with me a deep concern he has with the growing movement of hate groups that are popping up on online social networks.

When he began to investigate how groups who seemed to have no other purpose than to spew hatred were allowed to exist on Facebook and Myspace and post videos on YouTube, with emphasis on Facebook in particular, it caused him concern, as it should all of us.

The executives of Facebook companies told him that as long as these groups weren’t targeting a group of people or engaging in  “direct hatred” they were free to exist.  This is despite the fact that the advertised rules of Facebook prohibit the posting of any “hateful content without limitation.”

So, for instance, on Facebook you can apparently create a group called “Death To Islam” or “F*ck Islam,” but not “F*ck Muslims.” Or you can say  “F*ck Judaism,” but you can’t say “F*ck Jews.”  Call me crazy but all of the above sound hateful to me.   I fail to see the distinctions, but Facebook companies seem to think there is one. They have created their own private rules that somehow justify the existence of these groups on their sites.

I will always support “freedom of speech,” as long as it is not causing harm to others.  For something to be harmful however does not always have to involve a beating with a baseball bat.  The most insidious, widespread types of hatred are often much more subtle but no less dangerous.  As such, I think it is important to make sure that we do not allow hatred and violence to openly be spewed without any sort of consequences. As business leaders, we still have to be able to sleep at night, regardless of how much money we might be making.

Some of the people who own and operate these companies are dear friends, so I ask them humbly to re-think their policies. I urge the executives of social networking sites such as Facebook, YouTube and Myspace to consider that their platforms are powerful educators and motivators of our young people.  As such, there is a social responsibility to not engage in semantic distinctions of hatred on their sites that have no practical application in the real world.  These distinctions might seem minor in practice, but the effect they can have in the spreading of societal intolerance of others based on different religious beliefs is real. 

I am concerned that the words of Ahmadinejad will continue to influence young people in the Middle East and around the world. But I fear that online hate groups will have much greater influence than one isolated leader. If we do not let these social networks know that these groups are not welcome within our communities, then we are just as guilty. When the KKK marches today, it takes brave men and women to stand up to them and tell them to get out of their communities. We can do the same online.

It is a very important week for Muslims and Jews around the world.  The Muslims have just ended the holy month of Ramadan.  And the Jews have just celebrated their New Year and in a few days will observe their holiest day of the year, Yom Kippur.  It is a perfect time to come together and raise our voices of dissent against the existence of online hate groups. If we succeed, it will not only create a step forward towards a greater collective consciousness, but just as important, it will allow us all to sleep a little better at night.

-Russell

69 comments

  • What you are saying is totally true, how could we continue to allow Hatred to spread in another form, I feel that the world is driven by the hate of another. If this person has more I should not like him or her, if this person lives a better place then I should sabotog his residence because I think they should not have it. We are suppose to be a country of Free Speech yet the speech always ends up with violence and seperation, then we turn around and demand peace. There was peace all along! we were the ones to turn it another way. It is wrong for a company like FaceBook to continue to allow this partice, they are choosing to play word sematics to keep the dollar flowing. I think this matter should be pressed to the fullest.



    Keep IT STRONG.
  • Hey Russ! I have to say that I totally agree with the message you're trying to spread here. I also believe that if any reasonable person could find any way not to support what you're saying probably isn't as reasonable as they thought. It's just so difficult to snuff out the majority of all this hate; especially with it being so easy to be anonymous online. I guess we can only hope that the changes in some today will make it more possible for our younger generations to live in a hate-free world. Unfortunately, I don't see any of this changing until those who have so much hate for other cultures, religons, races, and such to finally realize that it is their closed mindedness which holds us all back. What's worse is that most of them pass these feelings along to their kids, the same way we pass our love and respect to ours.
    -One Love.
  • LMAO… Uncle Russ, you deny the Black Holocaust with your every pulse beat. I am not sure which dirty desert arab or unKosher jew you are sleeping with, but you need to return to their cave and leave the Black Nation the Hell alone.
  • I think that we should learn to love one another. That is the problem with the world is that there is not enough love. We have to show these countries how to love that is the only way for all of us to come together.
  • I think it's funny how people run to defend the Jewish people who have money , power , and respect, but where are the powerful people in the "private sector " standing up for the Black community who went through and is still going through the most horrific holocaust in human history. Black Africans transported by Europeans across the Atlantic for years! Do you know what separates us and them? I think it's obvious; don't you? Truth hurts. One.
  • Come on Godfather. Take a look in the mirror. Def Jam has never put out a record that promoted violence or hate? When it hits close to home you got a problem, but when it sells records you count stacks?
  • I think the reason alot of blacks and hispanics can't relate to Jews is because the Jews have never tried to mix in with us to relate or do any business dealings with us on a lower level. You Uncle Russ have dealing with them because of their Wealth in the Industry of entertainment. So the next time you are around your jewish associates ask them when they plan on connecting with Blacks and Hispanics and coming out of their inner circle of refuge? And then you will understand the comments. Has nothing to do with hate, It has to do with experience.
  • Sadly there are some ignorant asses on facebook and as we Global Grind..free your minds slaves
  • Please pray for Demarco Harris, its unfortunate that we live in a country where the justice system says the life of a child has no redemptive value. ~Boss Lady
  • Mr. Simmons,



    African Americans have so much hatred for themselves exemplified by the continual use of the derogatory word "N...a." The number of hip-hop artists that respect your work and committment to the artform and culture is extremely powerful. Could you take a stand against the word.



    As a young intellectual, I've been in white institutions where any time blacks are not succeeding as much as other races or when there is conflict, the word "N...a" comes out or the look shines through the eyes of whites. Hip-Hop, in a sense, has taken some power over the word but only in the form of directing hatred towards ourselves. Hip-Hop is not the culture of self-hatred but with the continuous false illusions of beauty, illiteracy, and the use of the word "N...a" other races clearly see it's a problem but why can't Hip Hop see it and stop it. If Hip-Hop would have done this, it would have had more influence than Obama's election. It would pave the way for young African American boys who hate themselves due to years and years of cultural attack on African American men, who can now only agree that the best way to make it is just to admit that you're a "N..." and make some cash.

    • Look on the bright side - it keeps white people from taking control of hip-hop as a genre.

      It's not easy to 'signify' if you don't say that word, and you can't get away with it if you're not entitled to it.

      I don't think the people who say it are getting enough credit for their own point of view. They're giving nothing away, least of all, self-respect.
    • The massive international influence Hip Hop has on the world as far as it's representation of certain parts of African American culture, has educated the world of dark peoples subjected to colonialism and capitalism by providing an exegesis of the current meaning of the word "N..a." Hip Hop oftentimes, consist of a story by young lower and middle class African American men that showcases the linguistic configuration of what it means to be a "N...a" in a post-modern sense.



      Moreover, the post-modern "N...a" is so intellectually deprived as to how the world works, and I use the word intellectual because he has street smarts, oh yes, but is not interested in the genre of history, philosophy, economics, or mastery of the other academic disciplines. There are so many forms of "N...a" as indicated in the lyrics of hip-hop and they can't explain why it's wrong or right because they have not been set up to participate in the world on a real intellectual level. The darkness of African Americans not engaging in academia and being disciplined in world dialogue and thought is what is exemplified. There is a system that we live in, and it just wants to make sure that African Americans, indeed, African American men, understand their historical place as "n...a" and is quite happy to see the philosophy is being bred by it's victims.



      While the civil rights movement tried to fight against and stop the plan the Rap "N...a's" were born and took it to a whole other level because they didn't participate in the work of scholarship found, nurtured, and matured in the classroom.



      I'm not saying that most rappers are dumb, they are not, but as it relates to the structure of the world in a larger sense and the racialization of bodies that stems from the period of the Enlightenment,hip-hop seems blinded by and embarrassing type of ignorance.

    • All this to say there is no bright side. Rappers have entered the world ethnographic dialogue but without the education of the word "N..a", and it's linguistic ingénue, presentation and performance in a colonial and capitalist structure that shapes the world. It just outright confuses and undermines anything positive that could come out of hip-hop. It's like taking a sword and stabbing yourself with it. It shows the mental illness that is the product of a horribly oppressed and mistreated people. There is no bright side. And Hip Hop needs it's own D.E.F, Green initiative. The diamond is the minds of black men that need to be educated so that our people will be empowered and ontologically liberated. The souls of black men...hmm, Mr. Simmons has great influence over and he has a great work he needs to do here. Hip-Hop Moguls don't realize their world power, or maybe they do and would be afraid of what they'll lose? But with strategizing, it could be the time to help re-shape black America.
    • And Mr. Simmons has taken a stance on the word, but I just would like to see him do more... There's something very great inside of him.
  • RUSH!!HOW COME YOUR NOT DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THE VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION AT THE G20!!!!!PEOPLE ARE BEING ASSAULTED WITH SOUND TECHNOLOGY WARFARE AND VIOLATED!!!
    • agreed!! There is real hate goin on everywhere all the time.. Worried about Facebook and Myspace when what really needs to covered is what happened in Pittsburg last week over Freedom of Speech!
  • To my surprise, someone saw her profile with hot & sexy photos and videos on the millionaire & celebrity dating club
    ^^SeekRichBeauty.com ^^^^.Does she want to hook up with rich guys?
  • not sure why this was not approved on the HP - this is my second time to attempt posting this (it's getting published on my FB profile)

    I don't understand how or why Mr. Simmons claims to be concerned about Holocaust denial, and hatred (online or otherwise), and where he gets off preaching to people, when he supports chats with some of one of the biggest pieces of antisemitic fi...lth on the planet, Louis Farrakhan, and he coordinates quite often with ISNA, an organization which has shown clear jihadist and antisemitic sympathies. Even in July, ISNA was being called out for its antisemitic and Jihadist speakers:

    http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/7782

    Until Mr. Simmons can take a strong stand against these hateful people with whom he seems closely aligned, I find it difficult to trust that his intentions are pure or honorable.

    Recently, I tried to discuss these things with Mr. Simmons', political director, Michael Skolnick, but he seemed to blow off my concerns.

    David Appletree

    Founder
    Jewish Internet Defense Force
    http://www.thejidf.org
    LEADING THE FIGHT
    • "I don't understand how or why Mr. Simmons claims to be concerned about Holocaust denial..."

      You don't understand because you don't relate to personality first. Maybe I couldn't convince you to publicly condemn some prominent Jew who said something wrong. Maybe I wouldn't even bother to try.

      I wouldn't assume that because you won't agree to condemn someone within your ethnic or cultural group, that it means you're approving of everything they do.

      You're free to directly contact NOI representatives, or to write an open letter to Farrakan himself. What if he surprises you like Moammar Gaddafi?

      Even [pP]rophet (I remain religiously unaffiliated.) Mohammad changed his mind when directing his followers prayers away from Jerusalem and towards Mecca.
    • David,
      Your suggestion that R.S. is a hypocrite is misguided and weak. It's one thing to "support chats", it's entirely different to support a view point. Supporting "chats", i.e. dialogue is a powerful and intelligent way to raise issues and contemplate solutions. Therefore, we should ALL be supportive of "chats" regardless of what viewpoints are projected--so long as there is a balanced and objective dialogue.

      This is the power of a community having a voice. Supporters state their rationale, and opposing views can offer theirs. Ultimately, views that make the most sense will prevail. As humans, this is the closest we can get to the truth.

      Having said that, I find it deplorable that you would site campus-watch.org as a resource for accusations against ISNA or any other organization. Mr. Emerson is known and self-proclaimed staunch hater of Islam, and has extreme views of the religion. So in fact, the finger you point at R.S. is pointing back at you my friend.

      Also, R.S. in paragraph 7 quite clearly states that his closed friends run some portals that allow hate speech, and that he REQUESTS them to re-think their policies. So your attempt to discredit his intent or honor is deplorable and without merit. Reread it with an objective eye, and you might expand your narrow mind.
  • I only want to make one thing abundantly clear ignorance breds ignorance.
  • I agree with Mr. Simmons. For a long time, I've considered the ACLU position on what is or is not "protected speech" to be too liberal regarding the "rights" of Nazis or KKK to march in the United States.

    It is not necessary to grant groups the right to publicly use the symbolism which are associated with hatred for others more than anything else.

    For various European cultural and ethnic groups to take pride in their culture, it is not necessary to display the rebel flag, nor any kkk or Nazi regalia.

    Older historical use of swastikas exist with no relation to Nazis, but they may go a different direction, may feature 3 legs instead of four, or may be in the context of some Tibetan or an American tribal motif.

    Also, Scottish clans have their own regalia which precedes and has no association with the racist "klan" of the post-civil war United States.

    Based on this, I must ask, why should society grant hate groups the right to use the names and imagery which belong exclusively to hate groups? Take pride in your culture all you want, but don't dust off the regalia and "brands" of known hate groups.

    Secondly, I'd like to mention that Facebook was funded by CIA-affiliated venture capital funds, and the information they collect on hate-groups will be priceless in helping keep them thoroughly indexed and controlled.

    It just may be in the interests of national security to allow these groups to bring their friends on-line for a while longer before tightening up the terms and conditions.
    • One more caveat I'd like to mention is when a basic part of cultural identity becomes mistakenly associated with hate. Case in point: Sinn Féin

      Is that really the identity of an anti-English hate group? A lot of militant-types have claimed the name around over the years, and committed hate crimes under the name "Sinn Féin". All it means is "we ourselves" in Gaelic.

      A militant group does not have the right to monopolize Gaelic identity. Gaelic identity is not inherently anti-English. Gaelic cultural pride is not against English culture at all, so that "brand" is not inherently bad, only one which has been shamefully tarnished by hate-crimes.

      (For the record, I support the peace which has been established between England and Ireland. Even though I'm American, I identify strongly with both cultures.)

      I'd also mention NOI and La Raza, identification with which are not necessarily indicative of any kind of ethnic superiority movement. I hope all people can take pride in their culture without paranoia or hate.

POST A COMMENT

or Sign In

POST TO:

submit comment