This section requires Flash Player (version 9). You can download the Flash player here

 

Celeb Blogs   >> more Celeb Blogs

Conservative Hate Speech A Recipe For Disaster

| 737 Views
3
8
COMMENTS

Hey Conservatives, Where Is the Love?

Yesterday, shots rang out just blocks from my office and reminded me that hate is alive and well. At the National Holocaust Museum, a shrine meant to commemorate lives lost to senseless violence and hate, a life was taken by senseless hate and violence. Security officer Stephen T. Johns was shot and killed by a white supremacistThis comes only weeks after the murder of Dr. George Tiller in the doorway of his church by an anti-abortion “activist”.

So what is the connection between these two tragedies and my assessment of the conservative movement? Ever heard the phrase “the freaks come out at night?” Well night has fallen on the Republican party and the freaks – racist, sexist, homophobic, intolerant right-wing loonies - are coming out all around us.

Back in April, the Department of Homeland Security issued a report drawing attention to right-wing extremism and warned that "White supremacist lone wolves pose the most significant domestic terrorist threat…"

Call me paranoid, but as I look today for ways to channel my heartbreak over Stephen T. Johns death into action (I’m looking here and here), allow me to state the obvious: in a time when conservatives are feeling particularly cornered – outnumbered by progressives that have the will of the people on their side – the right wing extremists are losing their minds and have gone hate-mongering crazy sometimes with a talk show. Other times with guns.

It is often said that violent acts such as these go beyond politics. Tragedy and the loss of human life is something that all people with dignity – on both sides of the aisle – can condemn. But does that mean there shouldn’t be any exploration into the cause or at least the context for such acts? Absolutely not.

This is more than a random occurrence that would allow us to shake our heads, shed a tear, and go back to business as usual. Its time for conservatives to look within their political leadership, examine their rhetoric and recognize their own role, be it intentional or accidental, in advancing hate and intolerance.

If human identity is part nature and part nurture,  let’s take a critical look at the entities and social systems that nurtured these natural-born nutjobs and made them feel welcome. Many of the people that commit these politically motivated crimes of intolerance identify with a set of principles and sentiments (anti-immigrant, anti-affirmative action, anti-choice, anti-gay, etc.) that are shared by the Republican party. Support for intolerant policies + leaders like Rush Limbaugh and Bobby Jindal making racist, divisive comments every chance they get, add water and voila! A recipe for marginalized, isolated, and already deranged people to feel justified.

The racist language espoused by conservative leadership and media about Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, the sickening message sent by a press conference being held today that said that Dr. Tiller’s death will  “help the anti-choice movement” makes the connection clear.  Change has not yet come to the Republican party….and neither has the love.

-Erica Williams

Erica Williams is a Washington D.C. based political activist, analyst, and commentator. She works at the Center for American Progress and is the Deputy Director of their youth outreach arm, Campus Progress, where she directs the national advocacy work of the organization. An acclaimed public speaker, her life's work is in advancing causes of social justice, and in particular representing and engaging her generation in the political process. She can be found on twitter @ericawilliamsdc and at www.ericawilliamsonline.com.

8 comments

  • DOWNLOAD "NO SEX IN THE CHAMPAGNE ROOM" BY CHYNAH DOLL TODAY



    WWW.ITUNES.COM/CHYNAHDOLL

    WWW.RHAPSODY.COM/CHYNAHDOLL

    WWW.AMAZON.COM/CHYNAHDOLL



    FOLLOW ME: WWW.TWITTER.COM/CHYNAH_DOLL
  • and how are these people connected to the Republican Party??? I'm a little confused, could you please explain in detail how these people are with the republicans? or are you doing some assuming young lady? shame on you.



    I wish we could live in a world where sterotypes do not exist. and people like Erica Williams could not preach her hate speech. But we do live in the land of the free and home of the brave so I guess we have to put up with people like Ms Williams. Stand strong America and don't let racist people like Erica Williams brain wash us.
  • cmyst, I respectfully disagree with several of your points. You are right that on paper, anti-gay, anti-immigrant and other anti- sentiments that I express may not be fundamental "values" of conservatism. Your distinction between bigotry and policy was well taken, if not somewhat semantic. However, much like a church is made up of its people, not its bylaws, the Republican party has unfortunately come to be associated with these labels because of the large number of people that ascribe to these philosophies under the guise of conservatism - including several of its most prominent and vocal leaders.

    Sure, there are Democrats who are anti-gay marriage - but they're not the ones committing the hate crimes against gay neighbors or saying that God has condemned them to hell. Sure there are some Democrats that are anti-choice...but they're not hunting down and killing doctors. Sure there are some Democrats that are against the DREAM Act and providing education to children of illegal immigrants - but they're not standing at the border shouting racial slurs. And to call them fringe denies some other important realities. My comments about the racism and homophobia of conservatism are a reflection of the divisive rhetoric of your leadership - the hate-mongering, the use of religion as a tool of governance,etc.

    As someone who has long been criticized about my Christianity from liberals who associate my faith with the most fundamental of its followers, I completely understand your frustration with these characterizations if they are not what you and many of the conservatives you know truly stand for. But the correct response isn't to deny these ills within the party - its to make every attempt to change them. My "finger wagging" at Republicans isn't about party unity or strategy (which is what both parties typically struggle with after major defeats). Its about the use of fear and propaganda to fan the flames of tension that already lie within the margins of our society. Its downright dangerous.
    • I think you misunderstood my point.

      I use the term fringe to decribe those whose actions deviate the focus from the core principles of the party they represent. Both parties have people like these that are at the forefront of the media.

      I do not deny/ignore that the fringe exists or that the certain members of the Republican "leadership" (who make their living by exploiting their listeners) fuel the fire of the opposition to the progressive/liberal movement. I acknowledge they do exist and there are people like myself who are working to push those people out of the "leadership" role and eventually minimize the damage they cause by stifling the basic rights of any human being within this nation.

      I clarified the principles and sentiments that you listed above to also point out the difference between those in the forefront of the representation of the party and those who have kept silent, hoping for the positive message to eventually win out. Based on what we are discussing now, hoping for the best does not spread the good message. Those people have to take a more active role in getting the message of tolerance out there so we can focus on things like our economy, personal freedoms and our defense. (Logically, continually spending on social programs for an exponentially increasing lower class is a path towards economic disaster and a threat to personal freedoms.)

      My point, which I apologize for not elaborating upon, is the reaction to the tragedy. That is the real danger. Our 1st & 2nd Amendment rights have been place in the crosshairs within hours of the incident. To clarify, the 1st Amendment expressly prohibits the United States Congress from making laws "respecting an establishment of religion" or that prohibit the free exercise of religion, infringe the freedom of speech, infringe the freedom of the press, limit the right to peaceably assemble, or limit the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The 2nd Amendment is probably well known but the laws that are in place to restrict access to guys like this (he was on a watch list for the attempted kidnapping of Federal Judges in 1983) ARE NOT ENFORCED.

      Quick and rash decisions especially in reaction to tragic events serve to hurt us in the long run. History has taught that lesson time and time again but for some reason we ignore the lessons. That was my point. Hope that clears it up.
  • I'm not sure where to begin!

    First off, the event that transpired yesterday was nothing short of a tragedy to the victim, his family and friends, and co-workers.

    I'm dismayed to see that the MSM, bloggers, etc are quick to politicize what happened when: he was a "9/11 truther" (painted as a liberal conspiracy belief) his targets included "neocons" (neo-conservatives) and fmr President Bush and Presidential candidate McCain. This blog has been just as quick to do the same. I noticed within a span of hours, the news began talking about restricting the 1st Amendment right to free speech and comparing whether or not domestic terrorism is worse than Islamic terrorism. Some have begun talking about restricting gun laws and circumventing the 2nd Amendment. I can't help but notice the panicked reaction and rash judgment based upon an irrational fear by supporters of the liberal movement while they criticize the opposing party of acting in the same way. Ironic, isn't it?

    Just to clarify some of the "requirements" for Conservatism listed above.

    Anti-immigration is a far reach and widely used to describe the political group. Illegal immigration IS what Conservatives stand against. There is a difference between the two.

    Anti-affirmative action is another one. There are many cases (do your homework) of where minorities are given positions for reasons other than their skills. More qualified people have been passed over on promotions due to this. The roots of the affirmative action movement had honorable intentions, but that doesn't mean it's immune to abuse.

    Anti-choice is a tough one. This is where beliefs get mixed in with politics. Under the core principles of Conservatism, a person is free to do what they please as long as it doesn't infringe upon the rights of another. Whether you believe a fetus is a person or not is your own choice.

    Anti-gay...wow. Maybe Anti-gay marriage. There are people in the Democratic Party who feel the same way (our newly elected President for one), but for some reason, this is kept low key. This would be the easiest fix for the GLBT community if they took this proposal to Washington. Take "marriage" out of government documentation. All marriages, straight, gay, lesbian, bi or transgender could fall under the same category...I don't know, lets call it a "civil union". This change covers insurance, adoption, hospital visitations, etc benefits under an ambiguous title that covers all unions. Religions keep the word "marriage" for ceremonial purposes and would not face charges for refusing to perform a marriage for a member of the GLBT based upon their beliefs. Religion and State matters would remain separate, as they should.

    Not speaking for Rush, Gingrich, Jindal, Steele, or anyone else that members of both parties look up to to represent the Republican party, but this finger wagging at the Conservative movement for "getting its act together" is nothing new. The Conservatives were wagging their fingers at the Democratic Party as early as 1996 and it took the Democrats 10 years to recover. Given the 8 months so far, Consevatives have work to do but it won't take as long for the comeback.

    Peace to All.
    • Cmyst, Anti-Gay,Anti-Choice are issues that the Republicans and Democrats need to stay out of. What I don't like is that in the stories coming out today they are treating the shooter as if he is the victim and that's wrong people of a color are frustrated but we don't go killing innocent people.
    • I agree, that those issues should be left out of politics amd both parties are guilty of exploiting those issues.

      If those sources you say who are treating this guy like a victim come from fringe groups, or fringe websites, then you should be smart enough to know they don't represent the party as a whole. Our people should know more about social sterotypes and not participate in being caught up by them.
  • It is time for conservatives to change their speech, but the sad fact is they're not because it's all about ratings and bringing in an audience. Lets see if the media is going to pick up on this convo. I realized that conservative white people are scared nowadays they are buying guns at an alarming rate afraid Obama is going to take their guns away. It's sad.

POST A COMMENT

or Sign In

POST TO:

submit comment