Back to the real world! As expected, not very many can accept others’ capabilities even if they showed that they initially did show an open-minded comprehension on your views as an individual. Everyone is different. One’s traits do not imply their portrayal of invincibility or being inhumane, it just happen to be that it’s what makes that person uniqueness. Thus connotes its individuality. Forcing others to think otherwise of their individuality, unique traits that they obtained from experiences & God-given strengths & weaknesses is like making such a liar of themselves just to satisfy one’s quest to prove you wrong despite all validations presented to prove your stance. Respect everyone’s opinion, but to force others cuz they perceive it otherwise regardless of their denial despite the validation u presented, is just absurd. Why do some approach things that way? If they can’t accept you for who you are, retaliating furiously are likely to come out when one is pushed beyond the lines crossed when the same topic is addressed redundantly and repudiated by others who have never been in a position to validate their claim against you. Why can’t some accept their ambiguity and learn from it. I refused to claim such statements of facts when I have never taken the path that the individual have taken to be where and how they turned out to be – as a result of their personal experiences. Hey, isn’t the fact when your fuse run short thus leading to such retaliation enough indication that you never denied being human? Compromise is definitely a must for better relationships, but not when the other had to force such belief that you are less than what you are & far apart from your true self. The latter can only lead to failure. Just my cue…..
I would conclude this note with this quote:’It’s not the critic who counts, not the one who points out how the strong man stumbled or how the doer of deeds might have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred with the sweat and dust and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes up short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worthy cause and who, at best knows the triumph of high achievement and who at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.’ (Theodore Roosevelt, 1858-1919, 26th US President and 1906 Nobel Peace Prize-winner.)
